Training on The Operation and Maintenance of Ultrasonography (USG) Equipment for Healthcare Workers to Improve Diagnostic Services at Community Health Centers in South Krembangan Surabaya

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35882/ficse.v5i3.150

Keywords:

Ultrasonography, Preventive Maintenance, Community Health Center, Diagnostic Service, Equipment Training

Abstract

Ultrasonography (USG) is widely used in primary healthcare because it is non-invasive, radiation-free, affordable, and capable of real-time imaging, particularly for maternal care, abdominal examination, and early disease screening. However, many healthcare workers at Community Health Centers (Puskesmas) have limited competence in operating USG equipment and performing routine preventive maintenance, which leads to suboptimal use of available devices and may compromise diagnostic quality. This community service program aimed to improve healthcare workers’ knowledge and practical skills in the proper operation and preventive maintenance of USG equipment. A one-day educational-participatory approach was implemented at the South Krembangan Community Health Center, Surabaya, combining lectures, interactive discussions, demonstrations, supervised hands-on practice, and a preventive maintenance workshop. Fifteen participants, comprising general practitioners, midwives, nurses, and electromedical technicians, were recruited through purposive sampling. Effectiveness was evaluated using a 20-item knowledge test in a one-group pretest-posttest design, a 30-indicator practical competency checklist, and a satisfaction questionnaire, and the data were analyzed descriptively. Mean knowledge scores rose from 61.8 before training to 90.7 afterward, an improvement of 46.8%, with reduced score variation indicating more consistent understanding. In the practical assessment, 80% of participants attained the “Excellent” category and the remaining 20% the “Good” category, and none required additional basic training. Participants also reported high satisfaction with both the theoretical and practical components of the program. In conclusion, the training substantially improved participants’ competence in operating and maintaining USG equipment, thereby supporting better diagnostic services at primary healthcare facilities. Continuous mentoring and periodic competency evaluation are recommended to sustain these outcomes.

References

T. Abbattista, M. F. Meloni, G. Ferraioli, and C. Pirri, “The urgent need to extend the appropriate use of ultrasound in Africa and worldwide: Overview, experiences and perspectives,” Front. Public Health, vol. 12, Art. no. 1363134, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1363134.

L. Shaddock and T. Smith, “Potential for use of portable ultrasound devices in rural and remote settings in Australia and other developed countries: A systematic review,” J. Multidiscip. Healthc., vol. 15, pp. 605–625, 2022, doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S359084.

A. Segura-Grau et al., “Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devices,” Ultrasound J., vol. 17, no. 1, Art. no. 38, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s13089-025-00433-5.

M. Murtadho, A. Sriatmi, and S. Winarni, “Implementasi pemeriksaan ultrasonografi di fasilitas kesehatan tingkat primer sebagai upaya dalam meningkatkan kualitas layanan antenatal: Sebuah scoping review sistematis,” J. Manaj. Kesehat. Indones., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2026, doi: 10.14710/jmki.14.1.2026.43-53.

W. Syafriyanti and A. Achadi, “Policy implementation analysis of antenatal care services at Puskesmas Negara Ratu and Puskesmas Cempaka, Kabupaten Lampung Utara,” J. Indones. Health Policy Adm., vol. 9, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.7454/ihpa.v9i2.8271.

A. U. M. Dewi, M. I. Kartasurya, and C. T. Purnami, “Analisis implementasi pemeriksaan USG dalam antenatal care (ANC) di Puskesmas Kota Semarang,” MAHESA: Malahayati Health Student J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 353–369, 2026, doi: 10.33024/mahesa.v6i2.20925.

F. Paustian et al., “Medical equipment in the global south: Perspective of sustainability and donations,” Front. Health Serv., vol. 5, Art. no. 1638305, 2025, doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1638305.

E. Njagi, K. Iloka, S. Wawira, L. Thiga, and N. Muraguri, “Learning from the Kenyan experiment: Key takeaways for implementing managed equipment services in developing countries,” Front. Health Serv., vol. 5, Art. no. 1361261, 2025, doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1361261.

D. Cohen et al., “Narrative literature review of facilitators and barriers to implementing computerized maintenance management systems in low-middle-income countries,” Health Technol., vol. 13, pp. 373–378, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12553-023-00743-5.

A. Maccaro, I. B. Oronti, E. Zito, D. Piaggio, and L. Pecchia, “Women in engineering, science and technology in sub-Saharan Africa: Cultural attitudes, challenges, and gaps affecting clinical engineering and medical devices maintenance practices,” Health Technol., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12553-024-00871-6.

N. Peters et al., “Comparison of low-level to high-level disinfection in eliminating microorganisms from ultrasound transducers used on skin: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial,” J. Ultrasound Med., 2023, doi: 10.1002/jum.16286.

L. Chen et al., “A multicenter study on the effects of different methods of disinfecting medical external-use ultrasound probes,” Am. J. Infect. Control, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.06.007.

F. Eppel, F. Hunstig, S. Bélard, and B. Kreuels, “Concepts for point-of-care ultrasound training in low resource settings: A scoping review,” Ultrasound J., vol. 17, no. 1, Art. no. 24, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s13089-025-00427-3.

A. C. Viner et al., “Training in ultrasound to determine gestational age (TUDA): Evaluation of a novel education package to teach ultrasound-naive midwives basic obstetric ultrasound in Malawi,” Front. Glob. Women’s Health, vol. 3, Art. no. 880615, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.880615.

A. C. Viner et al., “Implementation of a novel ultrasound training programme for midwives in Malawi: A mixed methods evaluation using the RE-AIM framework,” Front. Health Serv., vol. 2, Art. no. 953677, 2023, doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.953677.

D. Matheka et al., “A training program for obstetrics point-of-care ultrasound to rural health care providers in Kenya,” J. Obstet. Gynaecol. East Cent. Afr., vol. 36, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.128.

T. Yamada, J. Ehara, H. Funakoshi, K. Endo, and Y. Kitano, “Effectiveness of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) simulation course and skills retention for Japanese nurse practitioners,” BMC Nurs., vol. 22, Art. no. 21, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01183-2.

M. Breunig, A. Hanson, and M. Huckabee, “Learning curves for point-of-care ultrasound image acquisition for novice learners in a longitudinal curriculum,” Ultrasound J., vol. 15, Art. no. 31, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13089-023-00329-2.

A. Mulye, A. Bhasin, B. Borger, and C. Fant, “Virtual immediate feedback with POCUS in Belize,” Front. Digit. Health, vol. 5, Art. no. 1268905, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1268905.

C. Baloescu et al., “Artificial intelligence–guided lung ultrasound by nonexperts,” JAMA Cardiol., vol. 10, pp. 245–253, 2025, doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4991.

S. B. Bierer et al., “Moving beyond simplistic research design in health professions education: What a one-group pretest-posttest design will not prove,” MedEdPORTAL, vol. 21, Art. no. 11527, 2025, doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11527.

J. Merkebu, J. Geringer, and A. Samuel, “Sampling thoughtfully in qualitative research: Hallmarks of rigour in health professions education,” Clin. Teach., vol. 22, no. 4, Art. no. e70145, 2025, doi: 10.1111/tct.70145.

J. Kaewkungwal, “The grammar of science: How ‘good’ is your instrument?,” OSIR, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 2023, doi: 10.59096/osir.v16i1.262097.

N. L. Gallant et al., “Applications of the Kirkpatrick model in post-secondary health sciences education: A scoping review,” Int. J. Health Policy Manag., vol. 15, no. 1, 2026, doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8857.

World Medical Association, “World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human participants,” JAMA, vol. 333, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 2025, doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21972.

F. L. Eppel, F. Hunstig, B. Kreuels, and S. Bélard, “From concepts to evaluation: Mapping approaches to POCUS training assessment in low- and middle-income countries – A systematic scoping review,” Ultrasound J., vol. 18, no. 1, Art. no. 18295, 2026, doi: 10.5826/tuj.2026.18295.

A. G. Mubuuke and R. Nassanga, “Point of care obstetric ultrasound knowledge retention among midwives following a training program: A prospective cohort pilot study,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 23, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05429-4.

S. Lukhele et al., “The training of midwives to perform obstetric ultrasound scan in Africa for task shifting and extension of scope of practice: A scoping review,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04647-w.

C. Hanson et al., “Routine antenatal ultrasound by nurse-midwives in rural Kenya: A pragmatic trial assessing feasibility and effects of the Mimba Yangu (My Pregnancy) project,” Front. Glob. Women’s Health, vol. 6, Art. no. 1555547, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1555547.

R. Ramachandran et al., “Blended learning course for ultrasound-guided diagnostic skills: A design-based research study,” Front. Med., vol. 12, Art. no. 1680563, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1680563.

H. Kuperstein, K. Gada, W. Alam, and S. Ahmad, “A longitudinal blended learning curriculum for bedside ultrasound education in pulmonary and critical care fellowship,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06584-8.

J. Jerry and V. Gopalan, “A probe into probe use: Decontamination challenges of point of care ultrasound (POCUS),” Antimicrob. Steward. Healthc. Epidemiol., vol. 5, no. S1, p. s13, 2025, doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.111.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Engineering